Posts Tagged ‘amusing’

The middle class problem

Sunday, July 4th, 2010

When I say ‘the middle class problem’, I don’t mean that the middle class are a problem in England which must be exterminated. Nor am I referring to wider gripes with the notion of class itself. I’m actually bemoaning the fact that I’ve been beset by what I call a middle class problem. These are a specific kind of problem, which I will illustrate to you via the medium of an example.

My housemate was once leisurely ambling homewards from Cambridge city centre and, upon feeling somewhat peckish, stopped to buy a falaffel wrap from a local purveyor of nourishment. However, there arose an unintended consequence of his consumption of this foodstuff; amidst his ravenous demolition of the aforementioned wrap, he managed to spill houmous on his chinos, rendering them unfit to re-wear until they had been washed.

Now, I don’t imagine that houmous is high up on the shopping lists of those who perceive themselves to have little money. Nor do I imagine that chinos, often acquired for an unjustly elevated price from Gap, are their first thoughts when they wear out a pair of trousers. Both of these products are generally purchased by those with a little disposable income. A problem related to houmous and chinos is, therefore, likely to be confined to the middle classes.

Similarly, when the handsfree chord for your iPhone begins to malfunction, this is a middle class problem.

As I sit atop my duvet, at half an hour to midnight on a cool Summer’s evening – the duvet itself being bought from Marks & Spencer, thus continuing the middle class trend – I am troubled by a different middle class problem, on a level of typical unimportance for such a problem. It’s my foot; it aches because I’ve been walking around too much in my Birkenstock sandals.

Though I can commend them for their sturdy build quality, the sandals are only marginally more pleasant to walk with than my own bare feet. I have sprained a muscle in my left foot simply by walking around in the blasted things.

And that, my humble readers, is a middle class problem.

The gloriousness of mundaneness

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

Like I said in my last post, I’ve not been on this website to write as frequently as I would have liked to during the past two months. Now, with most of my final PGCE placement behind me and a week of half term holiday ahead of me, I intend to post simply because I have the time.

Today was one of the first days in a while that I could allow myself to relax guilt-free, in the knowledge that there was nothing pressing I ought to be doing. After a healthy lie-in, I left the house at one-ish in the afternoon, to go on a bike ride with no fixed destination.

The gloominess of the weather outside – a blanket of grey with an incessant alternation between drizzle and rain – could not dampen my good mood. Despite the grim meteorological conditions, I cycled myself out to Grantchester, via Newnham, and completed the loop by travelling through Trumpington on my way back.

I stopped only for a middle-class seafood cocktail sandwich in Waitrose, which allowed me to dry out a little before getting re-soaked. After this, I headed into town to browse the shops with little intention of buying anything. This done, I went to the supermarket to procure some vital acquisitions, such as an asjustable wrench and M&Ms.

About four hours or so after I had set off, I had completed a bike ride which totalled ten miles. Not too shabby.

So, this blog post did not contain any information of importance to anyone, but it’s nice to be able to write it. I good you bid night.

They still haven’t owned up

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

On March 27th, I reported that somebody had searched for “olly fayers fit cambridge news attractive” and gotten to my site, and attributed this to a prankster whose identity is presumably well known to me.

There was a follow up visit over a fortnight later, following a search for “olly fayers fit cambridge pgce”, which I thought displayed a certain dedication to the prank.

But alas, still nobody has owned up, and seeing as this mystery ‘admirer’ has not got in touch, the odds remain in favour of it being a prankster’s work. What I do know is this: twas somebody on a computer in Cambridge somewhere. I found out how to get this info from the clever little thingy which tells me these stats.

Come on, own up.

The most pointless object in the world

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Today, whilst I was wasting some time in a shop in Ipswich, I realised the identity of the most pointless object in the world. What’s more, most people are in possession of at least one of these. People often talk of the uselessness of a chocolate fireguard, but at least you could eat it if you felt so inclined. This object has next to no use whatsoever.

The most pointless object in the world - the travel padlock.

The most pointless object in the world - the travel padlock.

Yes, the travel padlock. It even dares to pose as something of use, which is entirely deceptive on its part.

I’ve carried out extensive* research, with two different padlocks and keys from different manufacturers, and found that any key will open any travel padlock. So the padlock is designed to stop people getting to your luggage, unless that person has themselves bought a suitcase at some point in their life, in which case they’re welcome to your clothes.

More amusing still is the way in which most people’s luggage seems to disappear anyway. It’s not due to sneaky thieves who rob holiday makers of their garments and leave them with empty suitcases. It’s the airlines. They’ll lose the suitcase along with any padlocks attached to it.

You see, they’re entirely pointless.

*By extensive, I mean ‘vaguely extensive-ish’.

Okay, very funny, now own up

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

From time to time, I go to Google Analytics to look at the data generated from visits to my site. In fact, I blogged about this some months ago. One of the most enlightening things you can use Google Analytics for is to display the search terms which have been used to access your result.

Hence, if you google “Olly Fayers”, I come up first. If you click through to this website, the stats will show me that a search for “Olly Fayers” got the user to the site.

However, someone has now used this to play a joke on me, and quite an amusing one at that. Recently a photo of me amongst other Green Party campaigners in Cambridge found itself to page 5 of the Cambridge News. I would imagine that the person who searched for, wait for it, “olly fayers fit cambridge news attractive”, would not seriously give those attributes to me. Nonetheless, good joke. I did chuckle.

In related news, people are still searching for Alexsandr Meerkat and “don’t even sound same” and finding their way here. Quite a few people actually, which is weird. I only really wrote the one post about it, and twas not even that good.

Meanwhile, a old friend of mine from uni (who goes by the name ‘Andy’) appears to have searched for “andy olly fayers powerhouse”, to hark back to the time we used the word “powerhouse” with liberal frequency to describe people with significant intellectual clout, or to wind other people up by calling ourselves powerhouses and denying others that status. Good work.

People are also searching for “lobster card”, which is what I call my Oyster card. One person searched for “who is Simon Fayers”, and I’m afraid I do not know.

Me and my big mouth (I regret nothing)

Saturday, March 27th, 2010
Me and my big mouth (I regret nothing)
I think that the title of this blog post would lend itself well to the name of an album track for Pink Floyd, or to the name of a piece of godawful conceptual art.
I’m writing to tell you of a going-on which I endured about a month ago. I didn’t write about this event when it happened; in my mind was a strong image of my dearest mother rolling her eyes at the latest minor pickle which I had gotten myself into. But, as is tradition on my blog, I’ll update you with the details of an event about which you presumably care little.
I was sat on a train heading towards Hitchin from London King’s Cross after a night in Shepherd’s Bush at the War On Want Comedy Gig 2010. For several reasons, the topic of conversation between my friends and I had moved on to the merits of Stevenage.
When I say ‘merits’, of course I mean ‘lack of any remote trace of a morsel of a merit’. Stevenage is patently awful.
Consider the town centre, which seems somehow more befitting of Airstrip One (England in Nineteen Eighty-Four) than Hertfordshire. It is dominated by a clock of wince-inducing ugliness. Next to this is a fountain, which made gave the vicinity a potent smell of ‘eau de public swimming pool’. Nearby are some public toilets, the closer to which one gets, the more one starts to crave the miraculously more pleasant smell of the chlorine.
Elsewhere in the town are plenty o’ sixties tower blocks, and several estates where each house looks more or less identical. This is owing to the fact that Stevenage new town, of which I am talking, was built mostly after WWII on a large scale. Stevenage old town cannot, thankfully, be tarred with the same brush as it’s younger and more brutish brother.
A long walk around the new town gives one a feel of a large social experiment which plainly failed. It’s bizarre.
Anyhow, to return to the train conversation. I was unwisely critiquing Stevenage on a train which passed through Stevenage. Thus, people local to Stevenage were in nearby seats. My words were significantly less stinging than those written here, and were more balanced about the strange feel which a new town has. (That said, I may possibly have referred to it as hell, by stating that if hell turned out to be on Earth, it can only be Stevenage. The truth is that it’s more like purgatory).
I contrasted it favourably to Milton Keynes at least, which is a town of such ugliness that you might find yourself reaching for nearby rusty cutlery with which to gouge out your eyes and thus prevent you from witnessing its ugliness ever again.
I also noted the quite odd, but not bad, cycle lanes which you find around the city. They go over and under roads, meaning it should be easy to get from A to B with pedal power.
Following my balanced summary of the delights of Stevenage (okay, my tongue is currently in cheek), I noted to my comrades that I should have maybe considered that nearby persons might overhear and object to my verdict.
This last point proved as accurate as my ones about Stevenage’s ugliness – as a woman got up to leave the train, and angrily barked at me “have you ever lived in Stevenage?”. I said ‘no’, for I had not. I don’t remember what she said next, but she was presumably going to question the validity of my opinion as I had never resided there.
Before she left, she justified to a co-traveller of hers – “Sorry, I was just really offended by what I heard”.
I now offer a few points of response to the mystery angry female resident of Stevenage.
Are you seriously implying that you have to live somewhere to pass judgement on whether it looks nice or not? That is imbecilic.
Have you considered that you are angry because you live in Stevenage? I’d be angry.
If you’d have seen the sympathetic glances I received from fellow travellers, and a comment about your rudeness from one of them, you might consider that you had been more unreasonable than I.
I’m from Ipswich. I know what it’s like to hear people criticising a town which I love. It’s just others’ opinions on something inconsequential. It doesn’t matter. Let it go.
Even though I take great amusement in pretending that my own worthless opinions are in fact the most important proclamations of truth which a human ear would ever receive, I’m not so arrogant to think that people should share an opinion of mine about a place I have no attachment to.
As well as Ipswich, people often cite the ugliness of the University of York. Like Stevenage, if you’re not a fan of sixties architecture, you ain’t gonna like it. But I have personal attachments to the U of Y, and I love the place. But I don’t get annoyed if people describe it as hideous. I can reflect on it enough to see where they’re coming from.
But no, not mystery angry female resident of Stevenage (MAFRoS). MAFRoS simply descends into blind fury that someone’s opinion of her hometown could feasibly differ from her own.

Me and my big mouth (I regret nothing)

I think that the title of this blog post would lend itself well to the name of an album track for Pink Floyd, or to the name of a piece of godawful conceptual art.

I’m writing to tell you of a going-on which I endured about a month ago. I didn’t write about this event when it happened; in my mind was a strong image of my dearest mother rolling her eyes at the latest minor pickle which I had gotten myself into. But, as is tradition on my blog, I’ll update you with the details of an event about which you presumably care little.

I was sat on a train heading towards Hitchin from London King’s Cross after a night in Shepherd’s Bush at the War On Want Comedy Gig 2010. For several reasons, the topic of conversation between my friends and I had moved on to the merits of Stevenage.

When I say ‘merits’, of course I mean ‘lack of any remote trace of a morsel of a merit’. Stevenage is patently awful.

Consider the town centre, which seems somehow more befitting of Airstrip One (England in Nineteen Eighty-Four) than Hertfordshire. It is dominated by a clock of wince-inducing ugliness. Next to this is a fountain, which made gave the vicinity a potent smell of ‘eau de public swimming pool’. Nearby are some public toilets, the closer to which one gets, the more one starts to crave the miraculously more pleasant smell of the chlorine.

Elsewhere in the town are plenty o’ sixties tower blocks, and several estates where each house looks more or less identical. This is owing to the fact that Stevenage new town, of which I am talking, was built mostly after WWII on a large scale. Stevenage old town cannot, thankfully, be tarred with the same brush as it’s younger and more brutish brother.

A long walk around the new town gives one a feel of a large social experiment which plainly failed. It’s bizarre.

Anyhow, to return to the train conversation. I was unwisely critiquing Stevenage on a train which passed through Stevenage. Thus, people local to Stevenage were in nearby seats. My words were significantly less stinging than those written here, and were more balanced about the strange feel which a new town has. (That said, I may possibly have referred to it as hell, by stating that if hell turned out to be on Earth, it can only be Stevenage. The truth is that it’s more like purgatory).

I contrasted it favourably to Milton Keynes at least, which is a town of such ugliness that you might find yourself reaching for nearby rusty cutlery with which to gouge out your eyes and thus prevent you from witnessing its ugliness ever again.

I also noted the quite odd, but not bad, cycle lanes which you find around the city. They go over and under roads, meaning it should be easy to get from A to B with pedal power.

Following my balanced summary of the delights of Stevenage (okay, my tongue is currently in cheek), I noted to my comrades that I should have maybe considered that nearby persons might overhear and object to my verdict.

This last point proved as accurate as my ones about Stevenage’s ugliness – as a woman got up to leave the train, and angrily barked at me “have you ever lived in Stevenage?”. I said ‘no’, for I had not. I don’t remember what she said next, but she was presumably going to question the validity of my opinion as I had never resided there.

Before she left, she justified to a co-traveller of hers – “Sorry, I was just really offended by what I heard”.

I now offer a few points of response to the mystery angry female resident of Stevenage.

Are you seriously implying that you have to live somewhere to pass judgement on whether it looks nice or not? That is imbecilic.

Have you considered that you are angry because you live in Stevenage? I’d be angry.

If you’d have seen the sympathetic glances I received from fellow travellers, and a comment about your rudeness from one of them, you might consider that you had been more unreasonable than I.

I’m from Ipswich. I know what it’s like to hear people criticising a town which I love. It’s just others’ opinions on something inconsequential. It doesn’t matter. Let it go.

Even though I take great amusement in pretending that my own worthless opinions are in fact the most important proclamations of truth which a human ear would ever receive, I’m not so arrogant to think that people should share an opinion of mine about a place I have no attachment to.

As well as Ipswich, people often cite the ugliness of the University of York. Like Stevenage, if you’re not a fan of sixties architecture, you ain’t gonna like it. But I have personal attachments to the U of Y, and I love the place. But I don’t get annoyed if people describe it as hideous. I can reflect on it enough to see where they’re coming from.

But no, not mystery angry female resident of Stevenage (MAFRoS). MAFRoS simply descends into blind fury that someone’s opinion of her hometown could feasibly differ from her own.

Telling apart the homeless

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

I happened upon a quote today, which comes from the essayist and satirist H.L. Mencken, writing in the 1930s. Unbeknownst to me, the words “hobo”, “tramp” and “bum” are not interchangeable, for there exist subtle nuances which dictate which term is most apt for describing a given person of no fixed abode. I’ll let H.L. explain:

Tramps and hobos are commonly lumped together, but in their own sight they are sharply differentiated. A hobo or bo is simply a migratory laborer; he may take some longish holidays, but soon or late he returns to work. A tramp never works if it can be avoided; he simply travels. Lower than either is the bum, who neither works nor travels, save when impelled to motion by the police.

And there you have it. The difference between various states of homelessness.

Valentine’s Cards for the Less Committed

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Following a discussion in B.L.D.s on Mill Road yesterday, I realised the sheer business potential of a set of Valentine’s cards for people who are in relationships but who aren’t up to the ‘love’ bit yet. Or for people who wish to inflict a bit of wanton suffering on their spouse.

Here are some of the messages which could be used…

  • You make me want to use the L-word… I like you!
  • You’re alright I guess.
  • Love is a big word… so it’s probably best not to mention it for the time being.
  • Sometimes a card says it all… but sometimes it doesn’t.
  • We need to talk…
  • I love you, but I’m not “in love with you”. Actually, that first bit was a lie.
  • I can’t do this any more.

I’ll just send these off to Hallmark in a mo!

McFight

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

I frequented the McDonalds in the centre of Cambridge yesterday, to appease my craving for one of their cheeseburgers. Whilst I was stood patiently in the queue, it all began to kick off.

A man on the far right of the line of queues was glaring at a man on the far left of the queues. At first, I figured that the initial acknowledgement was one of friendship, but the “Wot you f***in’ lookin’ at” seemed to suggest otherwise.

As they locked heads and started exchanging words, most of which were the f-word or the really naughty one that nobody’s meant to say, it became apparent that they only had a few brain cells to share between them. Unfortunately, the amount of brain cells they had was not the requisite amount which ensures that a human knows how to utilise their brain cells.

No fists were thrown, but there was a considerable amount of head-locking followed by the loud shouting of brainless thuggery, accompanied by attempts to restrain the Neanderthals involved. One member of staff knew man-on-the-right and joined in the swearing and gesturing at man-on-the-left.  I, meanwhile, stayed alert and altered my coordinates so as not to be bowled over by said oafs.

After their little scuffle, the man on the right returned to scoffing fries whilst awaiting further food. The man on the left, I think, left the establishment. They had both embarrassed themselves, and the result was a scoreless draw. I thought it unwise to posit this opinion to the young gentlemen, so I refrained on this occasion.

There is my account of a McFight.

Olly’s Second Haiku Anthology

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Some further haikus

for your consideration

I hope you like them

Haiku #9

He thought I said I

have a haiku but I said

I’ve a high IQ

Haiku #10

“Eat dirt!” I said. “I

do”, he replied, “I am a

most greedy earthworm”

Haiku #11

A haiku has much

more than fourteen syllables.

It has seventeen

Haiku #12

On and on and on

and on and on and on and

on and then nothing

Haiku #13

I cried and cried and

cried and then I cried some more

but at last I laughed