Posts Tagged ‘consumerism’

A nerdy technicality: Megabytes vs Megabits

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

I consider myself a bit of a nerd – this website which I’m writing on was designed by me with plenty o’code. Nonetheless, I must confess to some nerdy ignorance. It concerns the difference between megabytes (’MB’) and megabits (confusingly Mb).

The following was clarified by www.moneysavingexpert.com; I can’t help but feel that if I didn’t know this, then a non-nerd would not have any reason to know this. It simply constitutes misleading advertising. Looky:

Both measure amounts of data. A MB is used for things like memory stick storage capacity (and means just over 1m bytes of information) while Mbits measure data transfer speeds e.g. for broadband. For nerds an Mb is 1/8th the size of a MB, so an 8 Mb per second (Mbps) connection, at top speed would download 1MB of data per sec.

See – confusing. Just another trick to make consumers think they are getting a better product than they truly are.

This is not just M&S food… it’s all the other brands too!

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Strange scenes in the food hall at Cambridge’s Marks & Sparks today. Having spent a morning in the Fitzwilliam museum, I ambled over to the holy land of supermarket food in order to retrieve a pasta salad of inimitable delectability.

Having just plucked said pasta from its haven in the chiller cabinet, I glanced down to peruse the selection of crisps which were being purveyed by the purveyors, at which point, I was met with a curious sight. Where a selection of crisps made by M&S would once have sat, a pile of Walkers crisps now resided.

Seeing as M&S only sells food made by itself, and used to advertise them with the infamous ‘food porn’ ads, this was a little interesting. I turned round to find a whole stack of two litre diet coke bottles, and a sign stating that M&S had ‘made room’ for some of our favourite brands.

There was a rumour that even KitKats could be obtained if one looked in the right places. But, the most insulting part of all, is that nobody could find any Percy Pigs near to the queue, where one normally finds them. They have certainly not gone altogether, but this is a distressing set of developments for M&S purists.

What are M&S up to? I can’t see this one working out. This is not just a mistake… it’s an M&S unethically-sourced and completely unneeded mistake.

In praise of good customer service, part two

Friday, February 26th, 2010

A short while ago, I posted about the tremendously polite level of service I’d received in some Cambridge pubs. It’s probably more my style to verbally shred an establishment for failing to acknowledge the existence of customer service, but I’m returning again to lavish praise on another example of great treatment of punters.

This time, I’m actually going to praise a large company. This is a step out of my comfort zone here, so forgive me if this seems a little jaunty or unsure. It has to be said that the service I received from this company in the last week was, pretty much, excellent. That company is Orange.

Having toyed with the idea of getting an iPhone for some time, I ambled into the Orange shop in Cambridge on Wednesday feeling undecided. I said to the chap inside, Moe, that I might get one that day if I could have a free case to keep it in. He said he could ask the manager, but seemed reluctant to get my hopes up. I went to a few more shops in search of a nice case before returning to the Orange shop having failed to find one.

I asked Moe if he could persuade the manager to throw a free case in, and the manager quickly obliged. I went about setting up my new contract whilst the sales assistant explained everything really carefully, and made perfectly sure that I understood everything I needed to. He was polite, knowledgeable, and efficient.

To complicate matters, I requested that my old number be transferred over to my new contract. This, it was said, would take 24 hours. In fact, it took closer to 48, but this didn’t cause any major problems. However, I was trying in vain to connect to the 3G internet which provided the main incentive for buying the iPhone.

Cue the Orange customer service people. In fact, I think they have dedicated iPhone support people. No waiting on hold to speak to someone here – the chap on the other end answered swiftly, and he too was polite and explained everything I needed to do. He gave me some instructions, and said he would call back in a couple of minutes.

I carried out his instructions, and the phone worked as I hoped it would. He phoned back, and I thanked him for being so helpful. He asked if there was anything else he could do. Yes, this is his script – but he didn’t seem at all bothered to be performing it. Good for him.

I have paid what, for me, is a hefty sum of money to have my iPhone. As a result, I expect damn near perfect customer service from Orange; this is exactly what I have got. Kudos to Orange. (Not to forget the brilliance of Orange Wednesdays either). I am impressed. Maybe other companies might begin to treat their customers with a similar level of respect.

In praise of good customer service

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

I’m often to be heard growling angrily about the lack of good customer service in all manner of establishments, so it’s with an immense sense of pleasure that I can report some examples of positive customer service.

The nods of appreciation are directed at a few pubs in Cambridge, where I have experienced very friendly service. The first is The Prince Regent on Regent Street. The second is The Mitre on Bridge Street. The third is the Alexandra Arms on Gwydir Street, and the last is The Empress (my local) on Thoday St.

In each of my last visits to these establishments, the reception was exceptionally warm. I hope that my experience is typical of others’, and think that it’s best to reward said establishments with further custom. Until further notice, these pubs carry my official stamp of approval.

I don’t actually have a stamp of approval per se, but if I did, these pubs will have been stamped by it.

Cambridge Property Lettings Strike Again

Monday, January 25th, 2010

The letting agent we rent our current house from is Cambridge Property Lettings. They are pioneers in the field of letting agent lousiness.

Let me remind you about the treatment we got from them when we were moving in (or trying to move in) to the house. I posted this as part of a blog on September 7 2009:

The lettings agent I’ve been dealing with are having the times of their lives scamming me out of money. Their website proclaims “minimal fees for tenants” whilst charging us £150 each to complete a form for them. They insisted that we couldn’t move in on the 28th August, but insisted with even more force that we had to be charged from that date. (You’d think that’s illegal, but apparently not). Meanwhile, in spite of the admin fees, they have sent a tenancy agreement around to us where they’ve not even spelt my surname correctly. And, upon reading the tenancy agreement, you soon discover that it’s a set of conditions that no prospective tenant should ever have to agree to, were it not for the fact that they’d essentially find themselves homeless if they didn’t submit to the unreasonable demands.

I was quite charitable there; I didn’t mention the patronising tone and attitude of contempt which truly defines their customer service. Anyhow, they decided a short while ago to begin the letting process for next year. We’d been here four months of our twelve month tenancy (though the original tenancy was only supposed to last until July, they seemed to sneak a couple extra months in), and they’re forcing us to decide if we want the house for the next year.

Few people in our position know whether they will be able to secure a job and remain in the area eight months in advance of their renewal time, but this is Cambridge Property Lettings, and it’s how they work.  It is totally unreasonable, but judging by the fees they charge to check a completed form, why not get new tenants whenever possible?

They have now showed a couple of groups round the house for next year, and earlier today I received a ’so-bad-it’s-funny’ email from one of their staff. The first paragraph explained:

Last week, we conducted several viewings at the house, as you know.  Unfortunately, the condition in which you are keeping the house has been commented upon by all the groups (even though they themselves were students) and has put them off taking the house.

They were referring to washing up, and a room ‘with so much on the floor it was not possible to go in’. This is funny on several counts. Firstly, the room they are probably referring to barely has a floor to walk on – that is how small it is. It is barely accessible anyway. Secondly, the washing up pales in comparison to the obvious signs that Cambridge Property Lettings don’t maintain the property as they should.

Where to begin? The unstoppable mould invasion on the bathroom because they won’t fit an extractor fan? The food on surfaces because there is no storage space in the kitchen? The fact that my room would have been freezing cold because the windows don’t close? The fact that the door of my room won’t close? The fact that they have left years of junk in the cupboard of our house and in the garden? The fact that one bedroom has no heating and another is tiny?

It’s just so funny that they think we’re to blame for this. Not their contemptuous tone towards others, perhaps?

Nope, apparently it was washing up wot did it.

More on Cambridge Property Lettings to follow soon. I’m not finished with these scumbags.

Customer service at Comet: Apocalyptically bad

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

You’d think that in the midst of the dreaded ‘economic downturn’ than an electrical shop might be all too pleased to sell something to you for £260. I decided earlier this week that it was high time to buy a netbook, and create awesome teaching resources on the move. As it turns out, Comet in Cambridge really aren’t bothered about selling you anything. In fact, they seem a lot happier to simply annoy the customer. To be fair to them, they’re very good at it.

I entered the store at just past four. (Thought I’d make that bit sound poetic). Having looked it up on the Internet earlier, I had an idea of the right price to pay for the ASUS netbook I was after. Unfortunately, they didn’t stock the one which I wanted from the Comet website. I reluctantly decided to pay £25 for an upgraded model on the basis that I could take it home today. Voila, a quick £260 for Comet. You’d think.

I’d been there ten minutes now. It took a little while for a sales assistant to come over – they only pester you when you don’t want to be pestered, due to a bylaw which falls under the remit of Murphy’s law. I went over to the front desk, as instructed, to wait for my netbook to be brought over after paying for it. Having processed the transaction, I was waiting a while. Nothing seemed to be happening. ‘Nothing’ is quite a recognisable phenomenon, but it was foreign to the woman at the till. This woman was a whale of a being with twice the body fat ratio of the marine creature, a chronic moustache, and a breathing pattern which resembled a patient on life support. I asked her how long it was likely to take, and she nonchelantly shrugged her blubbery shoulders. Chain-store customer service for you.

I’d been waiting a while, and it was getting a little silly. ‘Ashwath’ in charge of retrieving the netbook was out the back having a cigarette. In the meantime, moustachey whale-woman mused with a fellow member of staff that a younger member of the team resembled a previous colleague. A few minutes later, in which time I had very much begun to regret my decision to go to a chain-shop which couldn’t give a flying fig about their customers, this Ashwath chap came over, smelling of freshly-smoked cigarettes. I wasn’t particularly high up on anybody’s priority lists.

It transpired, though it took them some time to realise this, that the two models they had in stock were both on display. They weren’t meant to be. In fact, they were each priced with a £20 difference in price tag. I was given two options – accept the ex-display model for a discount, or wait for them to order another in. I didn’t think I’d take my chances with option b, seeing as a customer parting with £260 doesn’t actually motivate them to give you the product. Option a turned out to be a reduction of £17 with a crummy power adaptor thrown in. Not quite enough to pay for something which may have been used an awful lot.

I created option c – a full refund and no further custom, but naturally it took them ten minutes to give me my refund. I thought it might be time for a polite word with the manager. I did in fact keep it very polite, but unfortunately her opinion was that giving me a £17 reduction was akin to charity as it was, and that this standard of service is no big deal.

I’ve learnt my lesson – don’t buy from Comet. Ever. If you’re attempting to buy something for a quarter of a grand, it should at least buy you a little courtesy or customer service. Not in Comet it doesn’t.

Go Go Enforcement Team

Friday, November 27th, 2009

Oh how I love the TV Licensing people – surely one of the most irritating groups in existence on our terrestrial sphere. Whilst nobody was living in this house during the summer, which presumably had no tenants whatsoever, TV Licensing were working themselves into a fuss about getting money from the non-existent people watching their non-existent television. By the time we arrived and begun our tenancy, it had got to “Uber final warning – we’re gonna send round the enforcement team to kick your ass”.

You see, when the TV Licensing people discover that your home is unlicensed, they don’t assume it’s because you have no TV. They instead adopt the policy of threatening you like the probable tax-dodging criminal scum that you are. Which is nice.

The other day, we received a letter entitled ‘OFFICIAL WARNING’. Just to make sure that we hadn’t failed to pick up on the urgency of the shouty capital letters, they also underlined it. It continues ‘our Enforcement Officers have now been authorised to visit your address’. The next paragraph reminds us that we can be interviewed under caution if we are using TV receiving equipment, and that anything we say will be taken as evidence.  Following this, the tone changes: ‘if you contact us now and buy a licence, we won’t need to visit your home’. (No reference to the fact that we may not need a TV licence because we’re not watching live TV). At the end it says “If you act now, you can avoid unnecessary visits to this address”.

Unfortunately, they have left me in no mood to do them any favours. It’s no great inconvenience to me to show them our non-existent TV. It will cost them money though to pay someone to do it though. Maybe if they had been a little more polite about it, I might be inclined to inform them that the visit would be wasted. I don’t suppose that matters though, as they appear to have decided that we’re criminals already. I would let them know by email, as opposed to premium rate telephone line or post (the only way you can get in touch with them about this), but I don’t see why I should pay to let them know that we’re not criminals. That should be assumed anyway, you would have thought.

TV Licensing, gotta love ‘em.

Orange displays fundamental unawareness of the definition of ‘unlimited’

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Morning readers. Hope the three of you are well. This morning I bring you news that mobile phone company Orange seems amusingly unaware of the concept of unlimited-ness.

A trip over to the webpage which details their new tariffs for the iPhone reveals that an ‘unlimited’ mobile internet browsing package is limited to 750MB a month. Funny really, because you would have thought that un-limited meant, by its very definition, not limited. Yet, there does seem to be a limit in place here. Quite a low one too. My logic must be failing me; I must be derailing from the tracks of sanity. After all, surely Orange cannot state that they do not limit something whilst simultaneously stating that they do?

I felt I had better consult the Compact Oxford English Dictionary to make sure that I was not mistaken in my naive assumption that unlimited meant ‘without limits’. Their verdict was: ‘not limited or restricted; infinite’. How strange – that doesn’t seem to be Orange’s interpretation of the word. There must be some kind of mix-up with the kind people at their sales department, who I am sure would not wish to mislead people by slyly imposing a limit where they claimed one not to exist.

I’m ever so confused.

The Great Day of Woeful Customer Service

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Today, I have been witness to multiple counts of woeful customer service on the part of multiple companies. Beginning with the chronologically most recent, an email from our lettings agent:

Hi

Please would you let me know if Bristish Gas have been and serviced the boiler, as this is a legal requirement in letting the house to you,

many thanks

Seeing as we pay them a gazillion pounds rent every calender month, and they charged us two gazillion pounds of barely-legal admin fees when we moved in, addressing us with a ‘hi’ and making their legal requirement to provide a safe boiler seem like our responsibility is a little rich. How about ‘Dear Tenants’ or something more formal or professional? Along with the sloppy ‘Bristish’ Gas, and the general feeling of abrupt rudeness, you’d think a gazillion pounds a month would at least get you some respect or customer service. Apparently not, according to Cambridge Property Lettings.

Next up is Virgin Media. Our internet went down last Thursday. We phoned them asking for a fix on Friday, and they told us that nobody could come until 16:00-19:00 on Monday evening. Not that we would be in at this time. Alas, I walk at a ludicrously brisk pace from my first day on a placement, and get in for 16:15. They actually turn up at 20:00. This, after three phone calls where their call centres tried to fob us off onto a different call centre whilst we wondered where the heck their repairman was. Virgin Media’s customer service is as bad as everyone says, take my word for it.

Prior to this, it looks like the culprit is either EDF or N-Power. Our provider is N-Power, but the vans near to the following works were labelled EDF. A random power cut affecting our part of the street at 19:00 turns out to be planned essential maintenance. How did the residents find out? Not by being informed beforehand – that would of course be too professional. They asked the workmen.

Before this, about ten minutes before in fact, was Perfect Pizza’s turn to provide no discernible customer service. Me and my housemate ordered a pizza. 15 minutes we were told, but it took about another twenty after we’d arrived to cook my pizza and give my housemate a lukewarm one which had been sat on the side for the 20 minutes. It wasn’t even the right pizza.

And before this, Cambridge City Council. For some reason, they refused to recycle the stuff we left for them. We must not be conforming to some bizarre regulations which they’ve failed to let us know about. Now we have a mahoosive build up of recyclable material, and no car to transport it to a recycling facility.

Whatever happened to customer service and professionalism? It appears to have disappeared.

Sk-english

Monday, July 20th, 2009

Sky is a big satellite tv company, English a widely-spoken language. Skenglish is the dialect used by Sky to communicate with their customers. This morning my mum received a letter from Sky, which began with ‘Making your Sky service even better’. At this point, you have to take a step back and acknowledge the importance of the English/Skenglish language divide. In English, ‘Making your Sky service better’ would mean ‘We are improving your satellite tv service’. In Skenglish, however, it means ‘Your satellite tv service remains the same, but we’re charging a higher fee for it’. Note the subtle difference.

This is confirmed further down the letter by the ‘Changes your subscription payments’ bit which itself cleverly avoids the word ‘increase’, and is written in tiny lettering anyway.

That, my friends, is Skenglish.