Posts Tagged ‘internet’

Silly Sausage of the Day (28/6/10): Google Maps

Monday, June 28th, 2010

I’ve not written about it on these pages before, but most days I award someone with the ‘Silly Sausage of the Day’ award. It does what it says on the tin – you get it for being a silly sausage.

I thought I’d share today’s winner with you. The Silly Sausage of the Day for Monday 28th June 2010 is Google Maps, for the following gem of cartographical errata:

If youre a first-time MP, consider a different map...

If you're a first-time MP, consider a different map...

Not only is Tessa Jowell herself a landmark, but the House of Lords now appears to be situated in the middle of Bridge Street, with the House of Commons newly located on Whitehall.

Google Maps thoroughly deserves its Silly Sausage of the Day award, and I am now unsurprised at the countless other things which are half a mile from where they’re supposed to be on their version of England.

(Hat tip: Paul Waugh at the Evening Standard)

Coming soon…

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

Nobody reads people’s personal blogs. As I often point out, the main readership of this blog consists of my mum. I don’t mind this – I write for my own amusement above all else, and if I were writing to attract an audience, I would probably have given up despairingly some time ago.

Personal blogs remain justifiably low down on most people’s “to read” list. After all, few want to hear a stranger, or even someone you know, prattle on about the minutiae of their life in a nauseatingly self-important tone. Many blogs tend to adopt this approach, and I’d probably stop writing mine were I to cast that same critical glance in its direction. (You may be vomiting at the irony as we speak).

Another reason that people find personal blogs annoying is because the writers often air their opinions on subjects about which their knowledge level ranges from “miniscule” to “non-existent”.

I shall cut to the point. Writing on www.ollyfayers.com the whole time makes me look like I’m my own biggest fan. It would be nice to write a blog which sticks to one subject about which I am (at least to some extent) an expert. I therefore intend to set up a primary education blog soon, which tracks developments in government policy about that very area.

We’ll see how it goes, but blogs which do specialise can sometimes get a small following of those who find themselves with similar professional specialities. It would be nice to put another opinion of UK primary education onto the web, even if it is not heard or listened to.

Fear not, I shan’t cease blogging about the self-important guff which I normally put up here. I don’t intend to do it less, but I do intend to create another blog elsewhere for that aforementioned topic. I’ll put the posts here as well, but they’ll look more professional in their own space.

More details to follow.

A nerdy technicality: Megabytes vs Megabits

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

I consider myself a bit of a nerd – this website which I’m writing on was designed by me with plenty o’code. Nonetheless, I must confess to some nerdy ignorance. It concerns the difference between megabytes (’MB’) and megabits (confusingly Mb).

The following was clarified by www.moneysavingexpert.com; I can’t help but feel that if I didn’t know this, then a non-nerd would not have any reason to know this. It simply constitutes misleading advertising. Looky:

Both measure amounts of data. A MB is used for things like memory stick storage capacity (and means just over 1m bytes of information) while Mbits measure data transfer speeds e.g. for broadband. For nerds an Mb is 1/8th the size of a MB, so an 8 Mb per second (Mbps) connection, at top speed would download 1MB of data per sec.

See – confusing. Just another trick to make consumers think they are getting a better product than they truly are.

Okay, very funny, now own up

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

From time to time, I go to Google Analytics to look at the data generated from visits to my site. In fact, I blogged about this some months ago. One of the most enlightening things you can use Google Analytics for is to display the search terms which have been used to access your result.

Hence, if you google “Olly Fayers”, I come up first. If you click through to this website, the stats will show me that a search for “Olly Fayers” got the user to the site.

However, someone has now used this to play a joke on me, and quite an amusing one at that. Recently a photo of me amongst other Green Party campaigners in Cambridge found itself to page 5 of the Cambridge News. I would imagine that the person who searched for, wait for it, “olly fayers fit cambridge news attractive”, would not seriously give those attributes to me. Nonetheless, good joke. I did chuckle.

In related news, people are still searching for Alexsandr Meerkat and “don’t even sound same” and finding their way here. Quite a few people actually, which is weird. I only really wrote the one post about it, and twas not even that good.

Meanwhile, a old friend of mine from uni (who goes by the name ‘Andy’) appears to have searched for “andy olly fayers powerhouse”, to hark back to the time we used the word “powerhouse” with liberal frequency to describe people with significant intellectual clout, or to wind other people up by calling ourselves powerhouses and denying others that status. Good work.

People are also searching for “lobster card”, which is what I call my Oyster card. One person searched for “who is Simon Fayers”, and I’m afraid I do not know.

Just putting it out there, but Google Wave is rubbish

Saturday, December 19th, 2009

For non-nerds who don’t keep track of technological developments, I may have to explain what Google Wave actually is. Google’s quest for world-domination has been taking on many forms recently, including the creation of their own web browser, the operating system of a mobile phone, a mobile phone itself, and a computer operating system. There is no end to the outstretching roots of Google.

Google Wave is a project of theirs aimed at revolutionising communication. The most common description seems to be a variation of “email on steroids”. And rather like taking steroids to better your body shape, it’s entirely pointless and counter-productive.

Email has its flaws, but essentially its asset is its simplicity. It’s an efficient way of sending information. Google Wave is a complicated way to mash information together into a gloopy electronic mush. It’s like an email which multiple people can edit, as well as do things inside, even including playing games.

It’s a curious resolution to a problem which may not exist. It’s like a football fan who wishes to watch their team play at 15:00 on Saturday but also has to play for their own team at the same time, and has also pledged to play their brother at a football computer game again at the same time. The solution is not to attempt all three at once via an intricate system meaning you can’t do either of the things effectively. Yet, this seems to be what Wave does.

Much as I love Google, I still suspect this project is a pointless one. Prospect magazine held this opinion also. I’ve often been wrong on such matters, so I shan’t be surprised if it becomes an amazing success, but just right now, I can’t see why it would.

Wondering why I’ve not been-a-postin’?

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

You’re probably not wondering why I’ve not been blogging much lately. I only have a three-person readership after all. Well, part of the answer lies in the fact that I’ve started messing around with Twitter. Now, I did used to lay into Twitter somewhat. In a post which I penned back on the May 4th 2009, I made the point that Twitter doesn’t really do anything which a Facebook status update or a blog post don’t seem to do equally well.

Like I said:

Anybody can write a blog, to which anyone can subscribe. Anyone can have a Facebook page, on which anyone can view your status. Both of these options allow you the brevity of a tweet, and a blog even allows you to elaborate. It is easy to follow someone’s blog or Facebook status à la Twitter. Why, then, is Twitter so popular? I’m genuinely curious.

Broadly speaking, I still agree. (And yes, I did quote myself just then). But then again, I was missing a key point. I’m rather enjoying it precisely because that is all it does. You can simply put a small thought out there, limited to 140 characters. It’s vastly unlikely to be revolutionary, and is probably going to be banal. People don’t have to read it though. It’s just fun to do.

Of course, Twitter offers more functionality if you choose it. You can serve up other’s tweets yourself, via a ‘retweet’, and you can reply to people’s tweets and mention them in your own. You can also tag your tweet with keywords. But, you can just ignore that and limit your usage to outputting minor thoughts and following others’. The only thing which remains to be seen is whether I myself survive the other key point I mentioned in that previous blog post. Namely, the many reports that new Twitter users don’t use Twitter for long. Time will tell…

Incidentally, you can follow me on Twitter on www.twitter.com/ollyfayers or search my username, @ollyfayers. My most recent tweets are also currently appearing on this website’s sidebar. Toodlepip.

Like Tweeting, really.

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

Is there much difference me writing this and publishing it as a blog than as a tweet or a Facebook status update? Not really methinks. I still wonder what Twitter’s actually about.

All hail Zotero

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

Here’s another nerdy post. This time, I’m raving about an ingenious Firefox plugin called Zotero. Anybody who has completed an arts degree will know about the considerable pain caused by references and bibliographies, which vary widely in style and are easy(ish) to cock-up.

Zotero removes that excuse from the portfolio. Basically, you can input the details of any source, and it can output (in any chosen style) the references for you automatically. Better still, you can install an MS Word or Open-Office plug-in which helps it to auto-generate the bibliography from the citations you ask it to put in.

It is amazing, and means that when you’re writing an essay, you can actually concentrate on the important stuff. It can do a lot more than this besides, but the referencing thing is clever enough.

You Have Your Own Website?!?!

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Yes, I  have my own website.

When I sometimes reveal that little gem to people who I know, it is always hesitantly, and their response is always one of surprise. (more…)

“Follow us at work”

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

Lately, I’ve noticed a few media institutions calling for you to avert boredom in the workplace by following their content on Facebook or Twitter. Sky Sports were doing this during the Ashes, and the magazine section of the BBC site is currently doing this. Bless their naivety! No employers are kind enough to let their workers within 50 feet of a computer that is able to access Facebook any more. Surely they know this! It’s a fair point – you shouldn’t be on Facebook during office hours, but I’m surprised people still think you can go on it in an office.