Posts Tagged ‘literature’

George Orwell on History

Monday, March 1st, 2010

In chapter III of Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell describes Winston’s thoughts on the recording of history, which casts me back to my days as a history undergraduate. In the same way that Winston has no idea if the year is indeed 1984 or not, the only reason that I know my degree is as recent as two years ago is that we record time everywhere. My days as a history student in York seem to be an aeon ago.

In this passage, George Orwell picks up on something which I find to be strikingly true about the study of history. He says:

For how could you establish even the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside your own memory?

This is a potent question. How can you?

This point, put in the succinct style which Orwell remains so famous for, can be demonstrated with plenty of commonly-heard examples. For instance, The Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485 witnessed Henry VII take the crown from Richard III – but where exactly is Bosworth field? This is much disputed, because nobody ventured to record and re-record the exact mark of its location.

To go further back, The Hanging Gardens of Babylon – which sound like a quite breathtaking construction. But where exactly were they located? Not a trace remains, to the point that historians can question their existence.

Of course, one can’t trust any record of history which is written down – many records are contradictory. The problem is that the memory truly cannot be trusted.

How many times have you been sure that something has happened, and yet it has been proved not to have done? (Contrast your memory of certain goals in football games with the reality, viewed again on a replay years later).

Meanwhile, imagine if Watergate had been successfully covered up. It may never have happened according to the pages of history. It would have died with the memories of its culprits. No doubt plenty of conspiracy theories which exist are, against heavy odds, actually true. I often think that Watergate might have become a conspiracy theory had the right people been silenced. With no cemented evidence, it is quite possible that something which happened did not, in fact, happen.

This is the fragile nature of history, and is exactly why a tyrannical regime like Nineteen Eighty-Four’s Party could easily master it and use it as a form of social control.

Just a thought, which ultimately leads to my wider belief in solipsism. What can you actually prove?

Olly’s Second Haiku Anthology

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Some further haikus

for your consideration

I hope you like them

Haiku #9

He thought I said I

have a haiku but I said

I’ve a high IQ

Haiku #10

“Eat dirt!” I said. “I

do”, he replied, “I am a

most greedy earthworm”

Haiku #11

A haiku has much

more than fourteen syllables.

It has seventeen

Haiku #12

On and on and on

and on and on and on and

on and then nothing

Haiku #13

I cried and cried and

cried and then I cried some more

but at last I laughed

One of the best books I have ever read

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Last Saturday, during a long weekend returning to good ol’ Ipswich, my mum, dad and I went out for a coffee in nearby Woodbridge. Naturally, I did not partake in coffee-drinking, owing to my conviction that it smells pleasant but tastes like hell. The jaunts to Woodbridge have always been frequent since their branch of Costa Coffee opened to perpetuate my Dad’s addiction; I just love the place because they have a tremendous Oxfam bookshop there.

This particular purveyor of pre-owned literature is a favourite of mine. Whilst I was frequenting the establishment on Saturday, searching for something to distract my brain from compelling me to feast on more chocolate, my Mum managed to pick out a book and recommended it to me. I should here explain that my mum knows books. She knows them well. Your knowledge of books is inevitably vastly inferior to hers. She keeps the book industry afloat during hard times, and should essentially carry some kind of goodwill fiction ambassador title. On this occasion, the book brought to my attention was John Kennedy Toole’s A Confederacy of Dunces.

Over the next few days, it seemed increasingly like one of the best novels I have ever read. In the last year, I’ve read a few modern classics. Catcher in the Rye seemed somewhat overhyped, and the popularity of The Great Gatsby is mystifying. Confederacy of Dunces, meanwhile, is marvellous. The descriptive writing in the work is completely unparalleled, and the depth of the characters, and the richness with which you get to know them, is immense. Toole also manages to write in local dialect without producing a maddeningly dreadful load of prose, which is always an accomplishment.

The character of Ignatius J. Reilly, the book’s main instigator, is one of the most fascinating fictional creations I have yet come across. I defy you to read this book, and not to begin wording stinging criticisms of things in the eloquent-yet-verbose manner of Ignatius. Mr. Reilly’s way with words stops nowhere short of a total mastery of the English language. His words are as poetic as they are hilarious.

Mr. Toole himself committed suicide twelve years prior to the publication of this book. It is said that one of his chief reasons for doing so was his frustration that others did not share his view of the work as a comic masterpiece. This is ironic and tragic, and is yet further evidence of the blurred line between genius and insanity. The novel is a comic masterpiece. I certainly don’t remember reading a funnier book. To me, it’s on a par with The Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy, which itself is truly outstanding. Aside from being funny, this book does well to put across the difficulty of an existence in which you believe in your own worldview, but find others rallying against it.

Right next to my copy of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, this book now has sacred status amongst my possessions.

The Picture of Dorian Gray: Flawed, but still a book which must not be left unread.

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Well, I just summarised what I’m about to say in the title so if you have no interest in me rambling on about a modern literary classic, then stop reading here.

In part of my new quest to shift a considerable backlog of great books which I have begun reading and yet failed to finish, I reached the end of Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray this morning. One of the aims of my gap year was to read some of the classic novels which I had not previously entertained an interest in, and with a mere two months of gap year left, I have stepped-up the intensity of the drive to do so. Admittedly, I’m picking out the easy ones. Catcher in the Rye is not the longest of novels, and neither is Dorian Gray. I also bought a copy of The Great Gatsby last week, which seems very short indeed; I’ve pencilled it in for late August. Rather irritatingly, I started War and Peace a few months ago and only got twenty pages in, leaving over a thousand left. It seemed like a tremendous book, but my notoriously short concentration span kicked in and I questioned my ability to finish the book. Of course, it remained unfinished. So I have to get through War and Peace at some point, albeit after The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, a book which I love but have only read the first two-thirds of. I also got through 140 pages of Great Expectations before forgetting I owned it, so that too is on the list.

Never mind that, I was talking about Dorian Gray. The title character is a man of such great beauty that a painter, Basil Hallward, is absolutely fixated with him. At the beginning of the novel Hallward is talking in his garden with his friend Lord Henry Wooton, shortly before Gray visits him to sit for his portrait once again. Hallward is mesmerised by Mr. Gray, and believes that Gray has brought his painting to new heights. Due to Lord Henry’s well-known cynicism and individualism, Hallward is reluctant to introduce Gray to him, but Lord H. insists and thus causes a chain of events which would dominate the remainder of Dorian Gray’s life. Upon seeing the completed portrait, and admiring its beauty, Gray muses out loud how nice it would be if the portrait were to age instead of himself. Meanwhile, Gray is completely taken in by Lord H’s philosophy, and increasingly dedicates his life to the pursuit of gratification. It is a short while before he finds out that his supernatural wish has become true – whilst the portrait provides a changing visual representation of his soul, Gray does not age at all. Along with Lord Henry’s constant influence, this is a factor which influences him to pursue a life of sensual fulfillment and selfishness.

I will tell you no more of the plot; you should read it for yourself. High time to summarise my thoughts on it. In brief, I liked it. I will put it on my list of favourite books, because it is so thought provoking. I couldn’t read the book without reflecting on my own beliefs about aestheticism and hedonism, and what to do with one’s life during the short time that one has it. The characterisation is tremendous, providing a brilliant fictional case study for an impressionable young man who follows an indulgent worldview, but finds himself struggling with its implications. Dorian Gray is a very, very conflicted being.

The plot is gripping. I did not find myself bored, and was suffering from ‘just one more chapter’ syndrome on a couple of occasions. I liked the way that the book spanned decades of Gray’s life whilst managing to focus on certain events and social occasions which occurred during this time. Some of Gray’s sins are alluded to or implied, and some of them are witnessed directly by the reader. The surprising mix did compel me to read on, in the hope of knowing more about the workings of Dorian Gray’s mind.

Interestingly, there is a noticeable absence of a character to whom an unselfish person could relate. The main characters in the book are followers of a hedonistic lifestyle who look down upon the dullards who bother them with the real complications of their actions. Oscar Wilde himself was known to lead a life of excess, and his views on the credibility of his characters’ opinions are indeterminable. Wilde reportedly believed himself to be a mixture of Wooton, Hallward and Gray. There is no anchor in the book who seems to find the behaviour repulsive, except perhaps Hallward, who seems shallow due to his fixation with Gray’s looks. Although the course of Gray’s life in the book influence the reader to believe certain things about his philosophy, it remains unclear what exactly Wilde thought. The book does not seem like a manifesto, or the summary of a world-view which secretly persuades you of its merits. It seems more as though Wilde is commencing a debate on hedonism, and leaving it to the readers to form their own conclusions.

On the negative side, it seemed predictable. Some of the turns in the plot could be predicted from pages, or chapters before they happened. I’m normally quite unaware of the direction a plot is taking, but I think the reader will often find themselves a step ahead with this book. Also, great though the witticisms of Lord Henry are (in fact, Wilde used some of the quotes in this book in other works), the lack of an eloquent character to argue against him causes his own quotes to lose their potency. Like Socrates in Plato’s writing, Lord Henry is largely followed by people that put up only weak challenges to his arguments. Despite their obvious flaws, his arguments are upheld in face of a lack of opposition. This was quite dissatisfying to me. I should have liked to see Lord Henry in an argument with a moralist. Also, the prose is smattered with literary references which might be lost on the reader in an edition without footnotes. Several of them would have been lost on me, that’s for sure.

Nonetheless, this doesn’t take from how compelling the book is to read, or how thought-provoking it is. The unrealism of the plot’s ageing-picture premise amidst an otherwise realistic plot adds to the book’s allure. I thought it was tremendous, and deserving of the ‘modern classic’ label which it often receives. Definitely one of those books which one would consider ‘an influence’ whilst developing their own worldview and analysing others.

Just how good is Catcher in the Rye?

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

It is now fifty-eight years since J.D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye became available to anyone who wanted to read it. Since then, it has been placed on many lists of the “Great Books of the 20th Century” kind. Salinger, meanwhile, has remained elusive, and persistently refused to permit a film or stage adaptation of it.

The book is narrated by a 16-year old named Holden Caulfield. Not for the first time, he has been expelled from a school for under-performing. Clearly an intelligent teenager, he is hampered in his enjoyment of adolescence by extreme cynicism, insecurity, and at times, considerable depression – I think there are many of us which experienced the striking of a chord whilst reading this, even if not feeling too similar to this book’s protagonist. Master Caulfield is finding it difficult to find things to love about the world around him, and those who inhabit it. Aside from his love towards his late brother Allie, and his kid-sister Phoebe, he finds most people annoying; an annoyance which more often than not causes him to feel hatred towards them.

Due to leave his latest school on the Wednesday, he suddenly decides he has had quite enough. He packs his bags and leaves a few days early, displaying the kind of temperament which we expect of him during the next couple of days which he narrates, and which the novel comprises of.  He heads to New York City where his family lives, but lodges in a hotel to avoid breaking the news of his expulsion to the parents. In the meantime, he entertains himself by engaging in activities which he is probably too young for. Whilst doing so, he provides an expose of his attitude toward life, which is almost unshakably negative.

Once you’ve read the whole book (which is not long – a couple of sittings perhaps), and after a tiny bit of reflection, it does seem like a reasonably powerful account of the difficulties of adolescence. Whilst you’re reading it, I’m not sure it feels so impressive. It is not hugely quotable, like a couple of my other favourite novels A Clockwork Orange or The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists. It isn’t the literary equivalent of a film which would have me on the edge of my seat either; you’re not eagerly anticipating what Holden will do next. It adopts a slower pace than that. I found myself simply curious to find out whether he would achieve some degree of sudden enlightenment, and resolve to change his perspective. I would say that it’s the kind of book which is better to discuss after you have read it, than to read the book itself. Much like The Godfather to film. Just as I am writing this, I find my fondness for the book growing, yet as I finished it twenty minutes ago, I felt quite distinctly that it was a good book, but not a great one.

I might also question how well the book was actually written. Some of the narration seems like Salinger is trying too hard to build a character out of Caulfield, by repeated use of the same words and phrases. Surely there are only so many times one would describe people as ‘phoney’ without getting bored and feeling another adjective is more apt. The style of narration is incredibly repetitive, that is all.

In conclusion, how good is Catcher in the Rye? It is good, but not that good. Dare I say it, it’s a little over-rated. I was not bowled over, and I will not be unwavering in my praise fr it, I can promise that much. Nonetheless, it has been picked out from other works which also strive to encapsulate an adolescent disenfranchisement with society, and I suppose for that, it will always be discussed frequently.

I’d be interested to hear the thoughts of anyone that has read it, or just to hear what people have heard of it.